>>2632860sameguy. Rate?
>>2633314Solid photo, 10/10
>>2633389Love this! Shame that shrub is slightly out of focus. What was your process man?
>>2633429>>2633430>>2633431>>2633433Great job man. The colors look slightly faded, but it looks like a conscious choice and not a mistake.
>>2633527>>2633528Love the first shot. The soft colors are definitely unique, and give the shot a dreamy vibe. Second shot is kinda generic.
>>2633573Take some time to learn better framing and work on your post-processing pal. I feel like you just got into photography?
>>2633596>>2633598>>2633599>>2633601Fucking fantastic, especially number three.
>>2633608Too tight a crop for landscape. Get a proper wide angle lens bud.
>>2633616>>2633616Cute. Good job not overdoing it in post. Very nat geo.
>>2633617>>2633618>>2633619>>2633620You have a great eye for framing, friend. And the colors are gorgeous as well.
>>2633640This is cool.
>>2633748I love this! Great subject, framing, split toning is very effective here.
>>2633768Your lens sucks, sorry. It is noticeably barreled and moiring like a mf.
>>2633770Love the desaturation used here. Very well done.
>>2633781Holy shit I love this. 10/10
>>2633907Composition needs work.
>>2633910Looks washed out and underexposed imo
>>2633955Much better!
cut some of the top off. Too much empty space.
>>2634057It's okay I guess. Well-executed but the subject blows.
>>2634131Good shot m8
>>2634137flowers + bokeh
>>2634184The people kinda ruin it imo
>>2634297Current fave
>>2634472DUDE THIS IS SO MUCH BETTER. I'm so glad you fixed the cyanness(?) of the flower.
