>>2636364>the RF experience is ONLY available with Leica. that's the difference.Except its not. There are several digital rangefinder equivalents. They dont use a literal RF mechanism because they dont need to- but split-image and shit in EVFs has been a thing for a while now.
>actually I don't give a shit. sensor performance is irrelevant for the most part, and that sensor is still shit compared to anything Sony makes, no?No, actually. That's why it was so surprising when the Q came out. It's a modern, competitive sensor. The other digital Leicas have godawfully old sensors.
>oh, and CornerFix corrects all those issues for non-RF lensesThose are software corrections making use of sensor latitude.
More sensor latitude = better corrections.
Are you sure you're not the one that's literally retarded?
>so, again, NO REASON to spend all that money on a FIXED LENS AF POINT AND SHOOT.It also has wonderful autofocus, a literal first for Leica. And a crop-mode EVF that shows framelines, akin to the RF shooting experience when shooting its crop modes- plenty of resolution to cover the use of crop modes too, particularly with a purpose-built lens.
>nice ad hom. your "arguments" are irrelevant at this point.You never had any arguments.
You're just upset that a product exists, even though it's not harming the other product you're obsessed with but cannot actually afford in the first place.
p.s. I have a Bessa, before you employ your next strawman
>nice strawmanSpeaking of strawmans, I don't think you know what they are. That wasn't a strawman. That was me addressing a false dichotomy on your part.
