Are these excluding the keepers you submitted to the mag? They're nice, shame you didn't have enough time to get anything outstanding
>>2633814 I'd say this is your best shot, the OP image should have been but >headmicI have a big beef about photographing bald people, their heads always look so much worse under stage lighting. Saying that I would argue the point that you could do more pp on Billys head to make the stage lighting look a bit softer,
>>2633816>>2633822The highlights are completely blown on different parts of his head on those shots. I normally lower the saturation and change the colour temp of areas like that until I get something that matches with his skin tone. At least then it wont stand out as much
Might also want to consider either upgrading the body or getting a 2.8 zoom when possible as these do look a little bit too noisy.
If they're actually going to print and they blow the image up that noise will come out really badly
