>>2644736not interesting subject, looks like kids being dicks in the woods. Not bad with the contrast and lighting.
>>2644732If you're gonna do "street" you need to catch more. This looks like any normal woman, walking to work. It says nothing of the location, environment or anything really.
>>2644711not bad, really like the lights hanging as a foreground element.
>>2644693It's a photo of graffiti, it's no more artistic than a photo of the mona lisa in the louvre.
>>2644690needs stronger geometry to allow the simple colours to pop.
>>2644688I like the tones and feel of this shot, but feel the composition is very lacking, you have a strong vertical element in a horizontal image.
>>2644686composition inthis one works much better, again, good control of the colour.
>>2644685No, just no. ugly colours, bad composition, bad subject, bad light.
>>2644655It's a nice shot of friends. It's an ugly shot if just for photography sake.
>>2644596pay more attention to your colour curves and your RGB mix, this should stop the crunchy yellowy colours dominating.
>>2644573nothing photo
>>2644553is this supposed to have inteerest?
>>2644540really fila? this is rather clichéd, but it shows a good eye for colour, contrast and composition. Apply this to more interesting scenes.
>>2644489good skin tones, nice exposure, just a shame about her eyes, because we can't see enough iris/pupil it looks like she's got real bad cataracts.
>>2644463it's just clouds...
>>2644461lost all the detail and interest in the trees
>>2644449boring shot of nothing, ugly colours
>>2644435wasted chance, I don't care at all for the bottom 1/3 of the image, taken at eye height lacks visual interest, the subject (the bird) is far too small in the frame.
>>2644432haven't paid enough attention to light, the guys holding that gun like a dildo. Doesn't convey any action or tension.
>>2644406learn 2 perspective you big nosed fuck
>>2644401nice, shame about that 1/800 iso 1600
