>>2651402If you're a begginer, this is an ok photo. Just because it's practice nonetheless.
In general: it's the typical boring flower photo, it's just not interesting, that's its biggest problem.
Next time I'd shoot at f/11 for more dof, and save the highlights a little in post, it's close to being blown but not-quite.
also, since it's not interesting: next time try lowering yourself at flower level. Shoot it against the horizon, try different things.
>>2651394First off: architecture photography is a pain in the ass. Perspective means a lot, and fixing it can be hard, impossible, or expensive. (I mean the buildings looking as if they were skewed because you're shooting them from below, tilting the camera. SOMETIMES it works, but you gotta plan for it - 90% of the time it's just annoying.)
Now, other problem... if you're shooting for the buildings, people are distracting and annoying unless you can place them in a manner that's meaninful. Can't? Get rid of them. Buy a strong nd filter, shoot on a tripod, long exposure and blur them away: it'll look less distracting and it will contribute to make an otherwise average photo more interesting.
Anyways, your pic is just... bad. There is really nothing salvageable. But it's alright, everyone gotta start somewhere and the best way to learning is snapping away, it's not like you're wasting expensive film.
Also, the picture is underexposed. It's way too dark. But nice sky.
Pic related is roughly an idea of a nice city scape picture, maybe you'll get some inspiration, even though it's a completely different setting.
