>>2653473Go back there and snap it again. Less photoshop until you actually know how to shoop well and, even then, when the photo itself is good. No use putting icing on a piece of shit, it's still shit.
No, really.
>tip of the cross is cut. That is VERY distracting>heavy as fuck white halos around all edges, literally worse than cellphone tier, NEVER DO THIS>looks muddy with little detail>highlights were blown and you recovered too much, now there are NO highlights, the sky has a flat grey hole where detail would beWhat do you do?
You go back there with a tripod.
Take it from further away so you will have more working space for perspective correction, stop your lens the fuck down because you need it to be edge to edge in focus. I'm talking like f/11, long exposure.
"fake" a GND filter by putting a piece of cloth over the top half of the screen for some seconds during the exposure so your clouds aren't BTFO (google this technique, done properly it works 80% as good as a GND. You can use a sock or something, just shake it so it doesn't show up in the final picture.)
Unless you have a GND, then use a GND.
Then in post you fix the perspective as best as you can, crop it appropriately, and shoop it WITHOUT THE GOD DAMN HALOS, remembering that blown highlights are blown highlights - you can't make them grey, it looks like dogshit.