>>2654598You just replied to a post most people ignored so you can talk about your "sessions" anonymously.
>>2654683Most people on /p/ don't shoot very often and because you shoot 100+ rolls a month does not make me care any more about your opinion than someone who shoots less <1 roll a month.
>>2654701>if you don't actually take photography seriously, you shouldn't disparage people who do.Some goes for you trying to talk down people who shoot less often then you.
>I take, post, and share photos.Nobody gives a shit. Go to the instagram thread if you want to brag about all your followers.
>>2654826I thought it was just a blog complex like people from petapixel have but I guess anybody who calls themselves a photographer is so entitled to what their imagination leads them to believe they deserve. This is "/p/ - photography" not /p/ - photographers only - if you shoot less than a roll a week do not post". There is no requirement to post here and this is not your exclusive tree house.
If you are a "photographer" why the hell do you even need to post here? Certainly you don't wish to enlighten us lesser non-photographers with the experience you have gain through all those rolls of Portra 400 you shot in your "sessions" because you think we should keep quiet when real photographers are talking.
>If you're at a chef convention...Yes you are right except this is not a photography convention. Go to an actual photography convention so you can take all those pictures of models as you crowd over other people trying to do the same thing. Go to a photography convention so you can network and go home with 50 business cards. Go to a photography convention so you can see your favourite photographer give a workshop on how to take pictures of a guy dressed like a character from a video game.
I've seen more dribble and useless talk in one photo convention than I have seen on all my years on /p/. Clearly /p/ is not for you if you want a photography convention.
