>>2664000Better than people (named moopco) who give the same personal opinions, but try to communicate them as basic fact, rather than a subjective take on something he doesn't understand.
In what way does his post not fit the definition of "Comments"?
We are allowed to talk about photos and photographic experiences on a photography board, you know. Not everything has to be "Take my photo, and fit it to the rules you read about photography but didn't really understand, and then report back with my failings"
When I post a photo, I'd much rather know how it makes someone feel, than hear how you think I over exposed by 7 stops, or didn't stop down enough.
