/p/ - Photography » Thread #2663653

[33 / 15 / ?]

32KiB, 620x463, 1438310293789.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 03:30:48 No.2663653 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>2663783 >>2663845 >>2664254 >>2664774

>Exposure Program: Manual

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1417157007700.jpg, 49KiB, 306x387

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 03:32:46 No.2663655 Report

Quoted By:

Auto-ISO Program Mode master race reporting in.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1429643336191.jpg, 53KiB, 640x480

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 03:32:57 No.2663656 Report

Quoted By: >>2664254

>I only shoot film

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1431880585071.gif, 2MiB, 340x253

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 03:40:01 No.2663661 Report

Quoted By: >>2664254

>it's not actual photography if you crop it or edit it

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 03:52:59 No.2663665 Report

Quoted By: >>2663801

>I only shoot in natural light

>f/1.2 1/8000s ISO 50

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1441005476607.png, 470KiB, 790x720

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 06:40:18 No.2663728 Report

Quoted By:

>my camera has a really good rating on dxomark this year

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 09:03:18 No.2663783 Report

Quoted By:

>>2663653
Look at this fag thinking we're still using optical viewfinders.

Get with the times grandpa.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO image.jpg, 9KiB, 240x240

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 10:22:08 No.2663798 Report

Quoted By: >>2664059

>why would anybody buy a Leica?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 10:22:19 No.2663800 Report

Quoted By: >>2663834

Shooting above ISO 200...that happens?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 10:23:48 No.2663801 Report

Quoted By: >>2663841

>>2663665
Do people here actually do that shit? NDs exist for a reason if someone actually wants f1.2.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 11:36:15 No.2663834 Report

Quoted By:

>>2663800
Shooting narrower than f/2... that happens?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 12:01:35 No.2663841 Report

Quoted By:

>>2663801
Are you suggesting a longer exposure and extra piece of not very good glass slapped infront of your lend will equate to an improvement in the image?

Everyone here is so fucking dumb.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO maxresdefault.jpg, 96KiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 12:07:26 No.2663845 Report

Quoted By:

>>2663653
>i make threads that fail to inspire hate amongst other users for absolutely no reason

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Fedora-hat.jpg, 37KiB, 600x315

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 16:11:38 No.2663980 Report

Quoted By:

>I am pentaxian

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1428488661508.gif, 3MiB, 312x250

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 16:16:14 No.2663984 Report

Quoted By:

>what would Ansel Adams do?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Fedora-Hat-for-Men-3.jpg, 21KiB, 750x566

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 16:16:59 No.2663986 Report

Quoted By:

>full frame

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 17:27:44 No.2664059 Report

Quoted By:

>>2663798
Should be the other way around.

>I only shoot Leica®

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 17:54:44 No.2664085 Report

Quoted By:

>I need clean ISO 12,800

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 18:04:25 No.2664091 Report

Quoted By:

>Yo dude you should really make the change to Leica, it really is the perfect mechanical camera also have you seen the low light performance on the noctilux-

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1430067582068.jpg, 149KiB, 530x600

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 19:35:10 No.2664158 Report

Quoted By: >>2664336 >>2664454

>I literally cannot focus manually, I must use autofocus in every situation

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screen-Shot-2014-10-07-at-9.10.2 (...).png, 343KiB, 520x392

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 21:00:27 No.2664217 Report

Quoted By:

>I'm a photographer!

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO tumblr_inline_nlmwfaEL7S1s0p3g5_ (...).jpg, 65KiB, 500x435

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 21:03:17 No.2664219 Report

Quoted By: >>2664254

>I use a prime

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 2015-09-07 04.28.48 1.jpg, 333KiB, 923x923

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 21:08:52 No.2664222 Report

Quoted By: >>2664223

God, you guys are boring.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 21:15:53 No.2664223 Report

Quoted By:

>>2664222
Go away.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 9ec.gif, 2MiB, 640x360

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 22:15:27 No.2664254 Report

Quoted By: >>2664356

>>2663653
>>2663656
>>2663661
>>2664219

This is literally me plus:

>fully mechanical cameras
>medium format
>slide film
>my cameras are at least 35 years old
>expired film

>mfw being a filmfag is the worst and I'm not even mad

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 22:25:26 No.2664264 Report

Quoted By:

>I take pictures

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Sep 2015 23:22:31 No.2664301 Report

Quoted By:

>fedora meme image

>your camera doesn't matter

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 08 Sep 2015 00:14:41 No.2664336 Report

Quoted By:

>>2664158
To be fair, MF on kit lenses is so shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 08 Sep 2015 01:16:22 No.2664356 Report

Quoted By:

>>2664254

If you're scanning you really have to edit though. Prints don't look like a neutral scan at all.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 08 Sep 2015 04:53:16 No.2664454 Report

Quoted By: >>2664792

>>2664158
>using manual focus just so you can say you used manual focus

sometimes you need to use it, but what's the point in just ignoring a really useful feature your camera/lens has?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 08 Sep 2015 17:03:19 No.2664774 Report

Quoted By:

>>2663653
*tips fedora m'lady

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 08 Sep 2015 17:29:15 No.2664792 Report

Quoted By: >>2664793

>>2664454
Because focus-recompose is practically useless at fast apertures.

Because moving a focus point takes longer than just focusing.

Because my camera can't tell if I want an eyebrow or an eyeball in focus.

What's useful about a feature that takes longer and gives worse results than the alternative?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 08 Sep 2015 17:31:32 No.2664793 Report

Quoted By:

>>2664792
your camera can't tell? become one with the mirrorless, touch focus master race

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches