/p/ - Photography » Thread #2666582

[52 / 27 / ?]

177KiB, 999x665, image.jpg

Long Exposure Thread

Anonymous Fri 11 Sep 2015 04:52:59 No.2666582 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>2666584 >>2666590 >>2666598 >>2666632 >>2668418

Old one here:
>>>2631044

Let's see 'em. Anything slower than 1/80, on a tripod.

Koval and Flamingo, Las Vegas. F16 3sec

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO image.jpg, 205KiB, 999x665

Anonymous Fri 11 Sep 2015 04:53:39 No.2666584 Report

Quoted By: >>2666587

>>2666582
Another

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 11 Sep 2015 04:55:45 No.2666587 Report

Quoted By: >>2666588

>>2666584
Last for now. mandarin Oriental Las Vegas. (I was shooting a condo and it had a decent view so I fired off some shots.) hope you guys rike. Looking forward to yours!

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO image.jpg, 148KiB, 999x665

Anonymous Fri 11 Sep 2015 04:56:48 No.2666588 Report

Quoted By:

>>2666587
Fuck here is the pic

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 491496-R1-09-14.jpg, 103KiB, 800x540

Anonymous Fri 11 Sep 2015 04:59:33 No.2666590 Report

Quoted By: >>2666598 >>2666641

>>2666582

That is where Tupac died, nig.

Anyways, my pic is taken on a Pentax K1000, 50mm f/2, Superia 400. Exposure was like 10 seconds I think with only a PC monitor providing any light in that room.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 11 Sep 2015 05:12:39 No.2666598 Report

Quoted By: >>2666604 >>2666641

>>2666582
OP these don't look sharp. Is your tripod wiggling in the breeze? Did you have image stabilization for tripod use?

>>2666590
why?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 11 Sep 2015 05:19:24 No.2666604 Report

Quoted By: >>2666641

>>2666598
It's the downsizing. I use a phone app and makes the pics very soft. Looking for alternatives.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_9968.jpg, 73KiB, 1024x683

Anonymous Fri 11 Sep 2015 05:20:36 No.2666606 Report

Quoted By: >>2666610

30 second exposure of me taking a leak

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_8786.jpg, 80KiB, 1024x683

Anonymous Fri 11 Sep 2015 05:22:53 No.2666610 Report

Quoted By:

>>2666606
The night shots look cool in b/w. Especially if you have conflicting warm and cool light sources, yuck

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 11922932_10153505907845590_47438 (...).jpg, 153KiB, 2048x1365

Anonymous Fri 11 Sep 2015 06:32:32 No.2666632 Report

Quoted By:

>>2666582
Near Vancouver, BC.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 11 Sep 2015 07:36:42 No.2666641 Report

Quoted By: >>2668521

>>2666590
>>2666598
>>2666604

I think he means why do a long exposure on that shot. Theres nothing moving in the frame its just 2 toy things.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Quarry 3.jpg, 511KiB, 1200x800

Anonymous Sat 12 Sep 2015 21:12:33 No.2667516 Report

Quoted By: >>2667551 >>2668754

Do HDRs count?

I believe the exposures ranged from 1/8 seconds and 2 minutes.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Myra Falls.jpg, 1MiB, 1685x1120

Anonymous Sat 12 Sep 2015 21:54:40 No.2667536 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 12 Sep 2015 22:32:55 No.2667551 Report

Quoted By: >>2668347

>>2667516
>I posted it again

Htp

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Arcade Rose Parade.jpg, 642KiB, 1080x720

Htp Sun 13 Sep 2015 01:52:43 No.2667618 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Sep 2015 11:56:06 No.2668347 Report

Quoted By:

>>2667551

It's relevant to the topic, and the previous post containing it is long gone.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO _dsc8267.jpg, 411KiB, 1600x800

Anonymous Mon 14 Sep 2015 12:03:10 No.2668351 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO _dsc8350.jpg, 203KiB, 1600x800

Anonymous Mon 14 Sep 2015 12:04:39 No.2668352 Report

Quoted By: >>2668361 >>2668362

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 16363791488_9722c3c3fd_c.jpg, 244KiB, 800x534

Anonymous Mon 14 Sep 2015 12:25:05 No.2668359 Report

Quoted By: >>2668522 >>2668753 >>2668788

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Sep 2015 12:26:48 No.2668361 Report

Quoted By:

>>2668352
Nice shot

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Sep 2015 12:32:46 No.2668362 Report

Quoted By: >>2668497

>>2668352
I don't understand people like you,

You put all that effort into making it B&W insta-art, but you couldn't rotate it a couple of degrees ccw so you have vertical verticals and a level horizon.

Are you partially sighted? as that would explain both the editing style and mistakes.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO thumbs-up-enthusiastic-guy1.jpg, 14KiB, 283x424

Anonymous Mon 14 Sep 2015 14:17:14 No.2668418 Report

Quoted By: >>2668782

>>2666582
>no subject
>colours look like puke
>awkward palm trees
>Canon sensor makes everything look like smeared finger paint
>Canon lens makes those awful six-pointed stars

great job there, OP

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_20150914_182904 copy.jpg, 330KiB, 1111x824

Anonymous Mon 14 Sep 2015 14:28:47 No.2668423 Report

Quoted By:

How about 1/6sec resting on the glass?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO proof-for-fuccboi.png, 431KiB, 1326x726

Anonymous Mon 14 Sep 2015 16:17:52 No.2668497 Report

Quoted By:

>>2668362
check you vision sonny boi, none of the marked vertical lines are slanted in any way.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Sep 2015 17:23:20 No.2668521 Report

Quoted By:

>>2666641
My guess would be so he could get that sky gradient

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 14 Sep 2015 17:24:59 No.2668522 Report

Quoted By:

>>2668359
Nice

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_1573_small.jpg, 231KiB, 1000x667

Anonymous Mon 14 Sep 2015 23:38:07 No.2668718 Report

Quoted By: >>2668789

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Sep 2015 01:08:52 No.2668753 Report

Quoted By:

>>2668359
Nice small photo ;)

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Sep 2015 01:09:54 No.2668754 Report

Quoted By:

>>2667516
Nice

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Sep 2015 01:38:38 No.2668782 Report

Quoted By: >>2668991

>>2668418
>Canon sensor makes everything look like smeared finger paint
>Canon lens makes those awful six-pointed stars

Into the trash you go gearfag

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Sep 2015 01:44:56 No.2668788 Report

Quoted By: >>2669242

>>2668359
Would you post the full res somewhere? I'd kill for that wallpaper.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Sep 2015 01:47:29 No.2668789 Report

Quoted By: >>2669494

>>2668718
What lens did that?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO starstax__dsc8456-_dsc8425_light (...).jpg, 186KiB, 634x950

Anonymous Tue 15 Sep 2015 12:34:46 No.2668987 Report

Quoted By: >>2669202 >>2669503 >>2670418

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO _dsc8395-_dsc8416.jpg, 462KiB, 1600x800

Anonymous Tue 15 Sep 2015 12:36:40 No.2668988 Report

Quoted By: >>2669183 >>2669202

<table class="exif" id="exif1442320600844"><tr><td colspan="2">Camera-Specific Properties:</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2"></td></tr><tr><td>Equipment Make</td><td>NIKON CORPORATION</td></tr><tr><td>Camera Model</td><td>NIKON D800</td></tr><tr><td>Camera Software</td><td>Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 9.1.1 (Windows)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2"></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">Image-Specific Properties:</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2"></td></tr><tr><td>Horizontal Resolution</td><td>300 dpi</td></tr><tr><td>Vertical Resolution</td><td>300 dpi</td></tr><tr><td>Image Created</td><td>2015:09:15 15:01:20</td></tr><tr><td>Comment</td><td>"What a waste of D800" -Anonymous
</td></tr><tr><td>Projection</td><td>Panini General (19)
</td></tr><tr><td>FOV</td><td>187 x 97
</td></tr><tr><td>Ev</td><td>-5.73</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2"></td></tr></table>

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Sep 2015 12:53:53 No.2668991 Report

Quoted By: >>2669378

>>2668782
He wasn't wrong though, was he.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Sep 2015 19:35:14 No.2669183 Report

Quoted By:

>>2668988
dat exif

BurtGummer !!1cdp+8vuoOY

BurtGummer !!1cdp+8vuoOY Tue 15 Sep 2015 21:01:42 No.2669202 Report

Quoted By:

>>2668988
>>2668987
Damn, good job, nice shots.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_6105.jpg, 427KiB, 1000x667

Anonymous Tue 15 Sep 2015 21:06:28 No.2669209 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 16422614594_46ba026e62_z.jpg, 89KiB, 640x360

Anonymous Tue 15 Sep 2015 21:28:57 No.2669223 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 15 Sep 2015 21:51:35 No.2669242 Report

Quoted By:

>>2668788
Flickr has it
https://www.flickr.com/photos/tyler_boston/16363791488/in/dateposted-public/

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO DSC_5107.jpg, 327KiB, 1806x1200

Anonymous Tue 15 Sep 2015 23:02:34 No.2669294 Report

Quoted By:

Algonquin Park. Almost a full moon.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Stars2.jpg, 3MiB, 1365x2048

Anonymous Wed 16 Sep 2015 00:34:10 No.2669340 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Sep 2015 02:22:41 No.2669378 Report

Quoted By:

>>2668991
Go be a nigger somewhere else. We're having a nice thread here.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 91lUbqK3r0L._SL1500_.jpg, 268KiB, 1500x1438

Anonymous Wed 16 Sep 2015 06:36:25 No.2669494 Report

Quoted By:

>>2668789
Rokinon 10mm F2.8
a beautiful lens, good price too: $400.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO spitlongbw.jpg, 626KiB, 1400x933

Anonymous Wed 16 Sep 2015 06:39:18 No.2669498 Report

Quoted By:

Posted these in a recent photo thread, but here you go anyway. 1/2

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO beachlong.jpg, 661KiB, 1400x933

Anonymous Wed 16 Sep 2015 06:41:11 No.2669501 Report

Quoted By:

2/2

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 16 Sep 2015 06:43:06 No.2669503 Report

Quoted By:

>>2668987
Nice one mate, love star trails.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_1835-Edit.jpg, 529KiB, 1100x733

Anonymous Wed 16 Sep 2015 08:57:27 No.2669530 Report

Quoted By:

A rather old one

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Sep 2015 04:11:29 No.2670418 Report

Quoted By: >>2670436 >>2670453

>>2668987
Exif data says 243 second exposure time, is that right? Stars don't move that fast through the sky do they?

carlo

carlo Fri 18 Sep 2015 05:21:31 No.2670436 Report

Quoted By: >>2670443

>>2670418
you'd be surprised actually

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Sep 2015 05:46:20 No.2670443 Report

Quoted By:

>>2670436

He would be, because stars sure as fuck don't move the sky that quickly in four minutes, buddy. Four hours, maybe.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 18 Sep 2015 06:10:29 No.2670453 Report

Quoted By:

>>2670418
243 seconds * how many photos he used.
Photoshop would take the number from the first photo.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

Long Exposure Thread