/p/ - Photography » Thread #2670941

[12 / 5 / ?]

1MiB, 3264x2448, image.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sat 19 Sep 2015 03:41:26 No.2670941 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>2670945 >>2670971 >>2671047

>MICRO FOUR THIRDS IS LIGHTWEIGHT AND COMPACT THEY SAID
>ITS GREAT FOR TRAVELLERS THEY SAID

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Sep 2015 03:45:26 No.2670943 Report

Quoted By: >>2671098 >>2671124

That looks a hell of a lot more compact than Nikon's 200-500. What the fuck are you bitching about?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Original_ Buttermilk_Pancakes.png, 56KiB, 617x367

Anonymous Sat 19 Sep 2015 03:45:42 No.2670944 Report

Quoted By: >>2670946

Pic related. But I do share your frustration with long tele lenses. E-PM2 with an adapted lens that's 10 times bigger and 5 times heavier is a little funny tho.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Chris-Gampat-The-Phoblographer-S (...).jpg, 76KiB, 680x453

Anonymous Sat 19 Sep 2015 03:46:22 No.2670945 Report

Quoted By: >>2671047

>>2670941
That's tiny. This is literally the same equivalent focal length, but it's huge.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Sep 2015 03:47:36 No.2670946 Report

Quoted By:

>>2670944
Even the teles feel big on an em5 without the horizontal grip. At least I can have a small system if I want though

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Sep 2015 05:04:20 No.2670960 Report

Quoted By: >>2670997

I seriously worry when I've got my Nikkor 70-300 4-5.6G on an adapter off my G7. The lens weighs like 3x what the body does. Still dat 600mm equivalent though...

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO compact2.jpg, 357KiB, 1063x975

Anonymous Sat 19 Sep 2015 05:46:22 No.2670971 Report

Quoted By: >>2671047

>>2670941
That is minuscule. 600mm lens at that size?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Sep 2015 09:28:01 No.2670997 Report

Quoted By:

>>2670960
why would you do that?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Sep 2015 10:22:28 No.2671005 Report

Quoted By:

Enjoy your noise on your slow lenses.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Nikon-Coolpix-P900.jpg, 89KiB, 1000x643

Anonymous Sat 19 Sep 2015 12:47:30 No.2671047 Report

Quoted By:

>>2670945
>>2670971
>>2670941
So we can all agree that the P900 wins this one, right?

Or do you have a smaller 24-2000mm equivalent?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Sep 2015 17:34:15 No.2671098 Report

Quoted By:

>>2670943
>variable aperture zoom is smaller than a constant aperture zoom
You don't say?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 19 Sep 2015 19:14:04 No.2671124 Report

Quoted By:

>>2670943

A 70-300mm f/4.8-6.7 is more compact than a 200-500 f/5.6? What a revelation!

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches