>>2674678Loving your older stuff. Not really digging the football and text photos, they don't really fit with the established aesthetics.
>>2674789Photos of guns. Not really my thing, but you have clearly developed from your earlier work.
>>2674799Not really my thing. I have nothing against alternative techniques, but if you use them you should have a very clear reason for it, instead of just trying to keep viewers attention with visual cacophony.
>>2674803I hate the theme. Most are snapshots with film aesthetics that don't really work without a complementing story. Though you have a few nice landscapes later on. And the naked paddle dude against the horizon is great.
>>2674804Yeah I've learned not look here. Sorry.
>>2674882You have really great stuff mixed with lesser stuff (e.g. thousand photos looking up palm trees) I like your environmental portraits the most but you have other good stuff too. I like your color work way better than your b&w, and I think you should focus on it.
>>2675037You've really stepped up your shit. Like daymn.
>>2675043I like that you've focused on similar subject matter and style instead of the smörgåsbord of before. I really like the fire shots.
>>2675046your theme doesn't really work for me, the thumbnails are tiny and some icons don't load, and most annoyingly almost everything floats left. On the content I like your photos, but they are a bit all over the place.
>>2675056Really all over the place, you need to focus your posting more. Also you need more consistent editing.
>>2675109Same as above, plus I don't really like your theme it's really distracting. The background color is horrid and why does everyone need to see your tags?
