>>2678841OP here, i don't mind the critique actually, it's part of the reason i post to /p/. this is one of the only places where i can get unfiltered opinions on my photos, and i like that. i've learned a lot because of this in the past, and sometimes anons point me to things i've overlooked or didn't think actively about before.
>>2678826>>2678832>>2678839thanks for the discussion guys. its good to see some different points of view and i agree with some of the framing critique. sometimes i know my frame isn't perfect but there's no place to move to to reframe, because i'm on a ledge or there's a random lamppost in the way. the shitty thing with cityscapes is that you can't just walk around looking for the perfect spot like in open field landscape photography. i have no real excuse for
>>2678326 though, although i couldn't really move to recompose (was on a ledge on top of a car-park) i could've easily rotated a bit to the right, but i made the decision to try and keep the road sign off center
some of the dead space like in
>>2678333 >>2678732 or
>>2678734 could be cropped out, but i'm quite commited to keeping my square shots square. i just have to work at finding compositions that compliment the format better.
