>>2689747>street photography, simple video on the go, it would be nice to always have a camera with mewell, then out of these i'd look at either sony, gr or even canon
check out a youtube guy name bigheadtaco - all his vids are taken on a gr, but they're mostly his taken hand held by his wife who doesn't move around much
gr lacks any form of stabilization
canon's IS is better than sony's, but at least sony does have it
if you've got steady hands, or won't be walking around much then the gr might be doable for vids
vid autofocus:
can't speak to gr's, as I've never used the video mode
sony's c-af for video is shite
canon's is better
with sony, manual focus for video is generally advised, even if it's a vlog on a tripod - shit jumps around a lot for no reason
mf video on the canon is as bad as c-af on the sony due to stupid retarded controls
>I use a GH4well, with the lx100 you'd at least have comparable IQ, well, sorta, it's just a little big to be something I for one would like to take everywhere.
if I was going to take a lx100, I would probably just take my main cam
I handled it in store and found that it was not for me
canon feels solid, better built than the sony (which feels flimsily put together in comparison), but has numerous flaws that are just annoying
sony has its own flaws, but perhaps fewer of them (sony's menu's are a nightmare)
gr seems very well put together, but a cursory search on the net will find you looking at quite a large number of complaints concerning dust
and it is a concern
a guy that dismantled his attributes the dust problem to poor design and implementation of a gasket by ricoh
still, it's a sweet camera to own if you have use for it
try them all out in store
I found that the rx100m3 ticked enough of my boxes for what I had in mind for it.
that being said, I do have a gr, but it serves a very specific purpose
the rx100 would be more the generalist.
