>>2691998I like this, the cloud near the horizon is a bit distracting but its great.
Any reason you shot at 1/320?
>>2692002Really good, I would have maybe dodged the fog a bit more but its fine, if the benches were aligned with the peak trees tho would have made it. Good colors.
>>2692015Brenny method? looks good though, massive blur is a bit distracting, feels like the subject isn't completely in focus
>>2692016Too much blur, jeep looks shopped in.
>>2692020Face blurred on this one too
>>2692030Good concept but the lighting on the face makes him look like the crimson chin.
>>2692031I usually hate moon and astrophotos and shit but this is great because of the detail!
>>2692034Some clipping in the water, post rotated again - otherwise looks good.
>>2692044Who dosen't love red fucking pandas! This image feels like one that is made bust or not by sharpening and small detail dodge burning, I feel like if you went back and redid, could be much much better!
>>2692062Simple but I love it, you have an eye - don't stop
>>2692063Maybe better with a crop around the cones and the advert- I feel like that's the only thing worth looking at.
>>2692084Might be my monitor but it looks like you selectivity went over the two people multiple times with shadow/ burn brush and its creating a wierd halo effect around them that makes it look really shoped. Might just be my monitor though
>>2692089I feel tighter crop would be better, but I love it, good colors subject. bring out the 'heat' and it would be better
>>2692099If this was just a car in a lot at a metup I'd say its ok, but the background and the way you approached it makes it all better.
aaand here's my snapshit, working on learning photoshop with Michael Woloszynowicz youtube tutorials, may have gone overboard with the brushes.
