>>2709802You are judging a photo on its technical complexity, rather than its content and storytelling ability. It's okay, you are on /p/, the home of the insufferable gear fags, but you'll notice, there is nothing happening in that product photo of a dildo, whereas in the OP images in question, there is a mega famous super star performing explicit sexual acts at the direction of a master portrait photographer. These are vastly different.
to prove how easy and basic it is, please do a photo shoot of Taylor Swift giving pretend head to a police baton with a strap-on. That would clear it up pretty quickly.
Reminder that; if the only thing making your photos unique is where you put your lights, you're not a photographer, you're a technician.