/p/ - Photography » Thread #2714298

[37 / 12 / ?]

369KiB, 1920x1080, what-the-shit-is-this.jpg

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 10:14:02 No.2714298 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>2714300 >>2714343 >>2714344 >>2714345 >>2715216

What the fuck Adobe.

I noticed this after going through a bunch of pics. When I use the "previous conversion" option (not sure if that is what its called in english, sorry), that hideous banding shows up. Only and only when using that. If I input the same very settings manually, it doesn't happen.

Has anyone else experienced this?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO asdf.jpg, 402KiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 10:16:49 No.2714300 Report

Quoted By: >>2714303 >>2714320

>>2714298
Forgot to mention, the banding sticks even if I zero in each slider. I have to pick "default camera settings" in order to get rid of them.

Here's the same pic with the same settings that caused the banding.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 10:20:13 No.2714303 Report

Quoted By: >>2714304

>>2714300
Your shadows are blue
And your whites are yellow
Fix this

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 10:23:22 No.2714304 Report

Quoted By: >>2714348

>>2714303
That's what happens when you shoot shade during the afternoon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 11:00:50 No.2714320 Report

Quoted By:

>>2714300
this is what happens when you shoot nikon

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 11:46:27 No.2714336 Report

Quoted By: >>2714342 >>2714343

>not using Lightroom
>not knowing how to set white balance
How dumb do you have to be?
>spanish origin
oh

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 12:16:49 No.2714342 Report

Quoted By:

>>2714336
I despise lightroom.

You are more than welcome to try set WB on your own; let's see your mad skillz: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3hsgfJQe6qKa3hON2NyTk1yRHc/view?usp=sharing

Let me guess, you are from the US?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 12:17:15 No.2714343 Report

Quoted By: >>2714347

>>2714336
it appears OP very well knows how to set the white balance, and is exactly referring to a bug that prevents him from doing it in an efficient way. If only you had the slightest reading comprehension.

>>2714298
never encountered that issue, could be due to how settings are saved maybe? are you (not) using a sidecar file for raws?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO tumblr_ltwdzpaxCQ1qzado8o1_500.gif, 475KiB, 500x200

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 12:21:05 No.2714344 Report

Quoted By: >>2714347

>>2714298
essentially your problem is that you haven't a clue what you're doing. Always use camera calibration instead of Adobe, then learn how white balance works, then get a cheap Yongnuo for fill flash.

I mean CHRIST ALMIGHTY a wedding dress isn't supposed to be fucking blue.

fucking hell

Jesus

fuck me
like what the fuck are you doing

>those half-heads of the children

>the bride looking like she's covered in coal dust

>her father's blue hair

oh my god

this is just too much

fuck

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 12:24:11 No.2714345 Report

Quoted By:

>>2714298
The bride looks a dude, man

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 12:28:29 No.2714347 Report

Quoted By:

>>2714343
Thanks, I've found the problem already - although not thanks to the morons here; apparently if you set the chromabs filter too high, it can cause this in certain situations. One of the first shoots of the set was wide open and had some chromabs and that was being passed on by using the same settings.

>>2714344
Relax Billy boy. I wasn't there professionally, just as a guest.

I do know how WB works. You are more welcome to show everyone your knowledge with the raw I provided.

Although I think you are a moron, since you called me on the cut heads, without noticing I zoomed the image, buffoon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 12:33:42 No.2714348 Report

Quoted By: >>2714352

>>2714304
that's why the flash was invented

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 12:36:13 No.2714352 Report

Quoted By:

>>2714348
Reading is a more important invention (^:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO DSC_4287 resize.jpg, 1MiB, 1406x938

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 14:45:27 No.2714395 Report

Quoted By: >>2714397 >>2714504 >>2715216

Here you go.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 15:02:48 No.2714397 Report

Quoted By:

>>2714395
Is that done strictly with just ACR?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO fohtoh.jpg, 440KiB, 1000x800

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 15:32:58 No.2714402 Report

Quoted By: >>2714403 >>2714422 >>2714504 >>2715235 >>2715403

I think too warm is better than too cold when you have people involved but I don't really know what this picture looks like. Did it on a 1366x768 12-inch screen.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 15:36:19 No.2714403 Report

Quoted By: >>2714422

>>2714402
Yup, slightly yellow dress is better than blue

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO DSC_4287 resize 2.jpg, 1MiB, 1406x938

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 16:43:30 No.2714422 Report

Quoted By: >>2714454 >>2714504

>>2714403
>>2714402

You're right. I agree as well.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO DSC_4287.jpg, 339KiB, 1188x879

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 17:14:06 No.2714436 Report

Quoted By: >>2714504 >>2714511

Here's my take on it.
Boring edit perhaps, but not pretending to be artsy with eye-stabbing grading.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 17:51:16 No.2714454 Report

Quoted By:

Don't you love it when you post a thread asking a photography related question, and all you get is a bunch of pathetic shitcunts commenting about how "terrible" the photo is, when A) He didn't ask for critique, and B) He wasn't even finished editing the photo. You're all a bunch of pathetic faggots, butthurt over the fact that OP actually has a social life and gets invited to events such as weddings, while you sit crying behind your computer screens, jealous and confused as to why no one loves you. Well done you cancerous cunts.

>>2714422
This turned out nice, obviously nothing incredible, but still a good pitcher. I guarantee it's a lot better than anything these armchair photographers can produce.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 17:53:05 No.2714455 Report

Quoted By:

itt: everyone missing the point

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 18:47:04 No.2714504 Report

Quoted By: >>2715403

>>2714422
>>2714395
awful
>>2714436
okay
>>2714402
best

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 19:08:14 No.2714511 Report

Quoted By: >>2714531

>>2714436
these are horrible. see that huge fucking shadow and see that huge source of gorgeous light behind it? Which did you happen to choose to shoot in? The kid is dark as fuck, banded shadow on the girl, nobody is looking in the right direction, looks forced af. let me guess you said "hey guys now i need you to get over in this super dark shadowy spot and run around and smile but *look natural*". you hosed this shot for sure and the rest are horrible too. but picking that huge blob of darkness to take this???

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 19:30:24 No.2714531 Report

Quoted By: >>2714573

>>2714511
>the rest are horrible too
Lel, there's only one shoot posted so far in the thread, you enormous faggot. Also op already stated he was a guest, not the photog paid for the gig.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2015 20:33:20 No.2714573 Report

Quoted By: >>2714778 >>2714879 >>2714928

>>2714531
one shot with 15 shitty edits you cock gargling piece of shit. you tell me what he got right here since you're such an expert. he even started cropping the kid's head off! take your camera, wrap the neck/shoulder strap around your neck and hang yourself with it if you're defending this garbage.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 14476528394857.png, 63KiB, 625x623

Anonymous Fri 04 Dec 2015 03:11:44 No.2714778 Report

Quoted By:

>>2714573
0/10.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO whatmightthisbe.png, 157KiB, 680x236

Anonymous Fri 04 Dec 2015 09:20:25 No.2714879 Report

Quoted By:

>>2714573
>he even started cropping the kid's head off!
How many times where you dropped in the head as a kid?

TheMule

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO DSC_4287.jpg, 763KiB, 1000x667

TheMule Fri 04 Dec 2015 12:25:35 No.2714924 Report

Quoted By: >>2715216 >>2715235

Best I could do in two minutes. No crop is really good, but I decided to go with this one because it would have been nice without the photog in the back and no one else used it before. Could have gone with square, but imitating a 6x6 with digital always looks like shit. Not sure about the WB. My laptop is way too yellow so it might me a little on the cold side.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 04 Dec 2015 12:51:52 No.2714928 Report

Quoted By:

>>2714573
the other edits were from other people. He posted the raw file so other people could demonstrate that it wasn't necessary to make a wedding dress blue, even if the original shot was shit.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1402271107202.jpg, 63KiB, 788x1024

Anonymous Fri 04 Dec 2015 13:49:50 No.2714934 Report

Quoted By:

>this thread
saved in hologram for future-proof kekking

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 05 Dec 2015 02:03:43 No.2715216 Report

Quoted By: >>2715456 >>2715460

>>2714298
>>2714395
>>2714924

How much shit did you crop out originally?

I'm almost waiting to see the next photo with a whole fucking orchestra in it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 05 Dec 2015 03:02:35 No.2715235 Report

Quoted By: >>2715312 >>2715460 >>2715461

>>2714924
>>2714402

why so bright? the background glows.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 05 Dec 2015 05:09:54 No.2715312 Report

Quoted By: >>2715456

>>2715235
op is bad with a camera even top of the line gear that's why

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 05 Dec 2015 08:46:15 No.2715403 Report

Quoted By: >>2715456

>>2714504

How the fuck are you gonna call >>2714402 best when the whites are blown the fuck out more than Pearl Harbor? Holy fuck how badly did you ruin this wedding?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 05 Dec 2015 11:15:04 No.2715456 Report

Quoted By:

>>2715216
>How much shit did you crop out originally?
Sigh, it never ceases to amaze me the sort of retards that post on this cesspool.
>>2715312
You know, I'd rather expose for the shade in that case and recover it on post. But then again I'm sure you'll do ten times better than me.

From your basement.
>>2715403
>Holy fuck how badly did you ruin this wedding?
That wasn't me. Also, read the fucking thread.

TheMule

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Unbenannt2.jpg, 127KiB, 1245x896

TheMule Sat 05 Dec 2015 11:26:26 No.2715460 Report

Quoted By: >>2715461

>>2715235

Because the people are undexposed as fuck in the original. But who cares? Do you need the background? It's rather distracting anyway.

>>2715216

Not much more. There's that girl and half a dude on the right. The Dad is pretty much in the center in the original.

TheMule

TheMule Sat 05 Dec 2015 11:32:36 No.2715461 Report

Quoted By:

>>2715460
>>2715235

To add to that, I had to add a stop of exposure on top of fiddling with the curve.

Which in numbers, would lead you to a nice sunny16 exposure for the shadows of iso100|f4|1/125s. If the OP had known anything about exposure he could have worked a little better with the colors. Especially the red on the boys pants is fucked.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches