>>2850500The difference being, Mozart is obviously talented and enjoyable, whereas most of Eggleston's work is fairly bland and empty.
For instance, many people would have trouble directly addressing the attached photo, and describing its positive qualities without talking about how all bland photos are actually good.
People post photos of old billboards here on a fairly regular basis, and get trashed for it.
And before you bother, a reply like "If you can't tell why that's a good photo then there's no helping you" it doesn't do anything to suggest you know anything that everyone else doesn't, so don't bother.
