/p/ - Photography » Thread #2850076

[97 / 40 / ?]

189KiB, 1000x673, L1010785.jpg

TRUMP RALY xDDDDDD

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 18:56:38 No.2850076 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>2850097 >>2850225 >>2850306 >>2851323 >>2851417 >>2851438 >>2854650

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010770.jpg, 173KiB, 1000x1487

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 18:57:34 No.2850077 Report

Quoted By: >>2850086 >>2852319

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010796.jpg, 124KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 18:58:53 No.2850078 Report

Quoted By: >>2850086 >>2852319

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010802.jpg, 230KiB, 1000x1487

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 19:00:25 No.2850079 Report

Quoted By: >>2850086 >>2850098 >>2850166

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 May 2016 19:01:10 No.2850080 Report

Quoted By:

DUDE MEGAPICKLES AESTHETIC LMAO

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010766.jpg, 181KiB, 1000x1487

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 19:03:45 No.2850082 Report

Quoted By: >>2852319

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010763.jpg, 111KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 19:04:59 No.2850083 Report

Quoted By: >>2852319

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010757.jpg, 308KiB, 1000x1487

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 19:06:00 No.2850085 Report

Quoted By: >>2852319

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 May 2016 19:06:27 No.2850086 Report

Quoted By: >>2850088 >>2852292

>>2850077
>>2850078
>>2850079
>grumpy old fart, mobility scooter fatty and PTSD vet'
Yep, 'muricah.
>Leica m8
Yep, as good as a point & shoot, nothing new here.

What about not blasting your flash full power and having some background visible?
Ignore the haters and keep posting.

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010761.jpg, 101KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 19:07:53 No.2850088 Report

Quoted By:

>>2850086
Background was meh, using flash with fast shutter speed to remove background. More subject, less visual noise.

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010756.jpg, 188KiB, 1000x1487

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 19:08:54 No.2850089 Report

Quoted By:

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010793.jpg, 176KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 19:09:56 No.2850091 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 May 2016 19:15:09 No.2850097 Report

Quoted By: >>2850099 >>2850283 >>2850322 >>2851427 >>2852377

>>2850076
Are any of these gonna be in focus?
Fucking awful so far.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 May 2016 19:15:56 No.2850098 Report

Quoted By: >>2850099

>>2850079
did you ask alan tudyk for his autograph or just his picture?

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010842.jpg, 390KiB, 1000x1487

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 19:16:39 No.2850099 Report

Quoted By: >>2850169 >>2850225 >>2850261 >>2854653 >>2854654

>>2850097
sharpness is for nerds

>>2850098
no idea who that is

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010843.jpg, 148KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 19:17:40 No.2850101 Report

Quoted By: >>2854654

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010851.jpg, 98KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 19:22:05 No.2850104 Report

Quoted By:

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010859.jpg, 210KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 19:24:09 No.2850107 Report

Quoted By: >>2850166

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010869.jpg, 144KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 19:26:01 No.2850108 Report

Quoted By: >>2850121

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010874.jpg, 370KiB, 1000x1487

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 19:27:03 No.2850109 Report

Quoted By: >>2850121

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010876.jpg, 265KiB, 1000x1487

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 19:30:32 No.2850111 Report

Quoted By: >>2850121

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010878.jpg, 327KiB, 1000x1487

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 19:31:35 No.2850113 Report

Quoted By: >>2850121

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 May 2016 19:43:44 No.2850121 Report

Quoted By: >>2850126 >>2850130

>>2850113
>>2850111
>>2850109
>>2850108
Why 4 pictures of the same guy

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010880.jpg, 295KiB, 1000x1487

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 19:47:22 No.2850126 Report

Quoted By: >>2850138 >>2854680

>>2850121
why not 5

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010881.jpg, 300KiB, 1000x1487

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 19:49:33 No.2850130 Report

Quoted By: >>2850138 >>2850164 >>2850166 >>2854680

>>2850121
or 6

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010889.jpg, 207KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 19:51:40 No.2850134 Report

Quoted By: >>2854680 >>2854694

Danny DeVideo !9q4aiMtvjM

Danny DeVideo !9q4aiMtvjM Sat 28 May 2016 19:53:55 No.2850138 Report

Quoted By:

>>2850130
>>2850126

kek

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 May 2016 20:28:05 No.2850164 Report

Quoted By:

>>2850130
>not 7
lmao

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 May 2016 20:31:20 No.2850166 Report

Quoted By: >>2850194

>>2850130
What is up with these lines (and banding) you're getting? I've heard the M8 is bad with high ISO's but really, that's pretty horrendous.

I dig the tones in the BW pics, color pics are too blown out even though I'm familiar with your style.

Faves so far:
>>2850079
>>2850107
>>2850130

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 May 2016 20:33:49 No.2850169 Report

Quoted By: >>2850188

>>2850099
sharpness != in focus

being in focus is a basic prerequisite, sharpness is a bourgeois concept.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 May 2016 20:49:32 No.2850188 Report

Quoted By:

>>2850169
>we wuz bolsheviks n shiiiet

Danny DeVideo !9q4aiMtvjM

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO DSCF4651-1.jpg, 461KiB, 800x1200

Danny DeVideo !9q4aiMtvjM Sat 28 May 2016 20:53:41 No.2850194 Report

Quoted By:

>>2850166
He can feel the noise, can you?

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010891.jpg, 224KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 21:16:59 No.2850221 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 May 2016 21:17:41 No.2850225 Report

Quoted By:

>>2850099
>>2850076
How the fuck did you take these? These are amazing

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010895.jpg, 428KiB, 1000x1487

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 21:18:01 No.2850226 Report

Quoted By: >>2850261

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 May 2016 21:21:13 No.2850229 Report

Quoted By:

Fix your black levels.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 May 2016 21:22:21 No.2850231 Report

Quoted By:

cool pictures

maga

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010898.jpg, 414KiB, 1000x1487

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 21:53:09 No.2850256 Report

Quoted By:

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010906.jpg, 77KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 21:54:10 No.2850257 Report

Quoted By: >>2850343 >>2853203

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010919.jpg, 172KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 21:55:11 No.2850259 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 May 2016 21:55:35 No.2850260 Report

Quoted By: >>2850275

How were these all done? Is the whole fuzzy 60s effect by camera or by photoshop?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 May 2016 21:55:40 No.2850261 Report

Quoted By:

>>2850099
>>2850226
these ones are nice

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010924.jpg, 148KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 21:58:00 No.2850265 Report

Quoted By:

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010929.jpg, 132KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 21:59:29 No.2850267 Report

Quoted By: >>2850268

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010920.jpg, 146KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 22:01:03 No.2850268 Report

Quoted By:

>>2850267

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010926.jpg, 131KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 22:02:18 No.2850270 Report

Quoted By:

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010932.jpg, 160KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 22:03:19 No.2850273 Report

Quoted By:

Danny DeVideo !9q4aiMtvjM

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO DSCF4576-1.jpg, 734KiB, 1200x753

Danny DeVideo !9q4aiMtvjM Sat 28 May 2016 22:05:11 No.2850275 Report

Quoted By: >>2858072

>>2850260
Wolverine was there and he told us all of his photo secrets.

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010934.jpg, 171KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 22:13:02 No.2850282 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 May 2016 22:13:11 No.2850283 Report

Quoted By:

>>2850097
How about you show us YOUR shots?
Oh wait..

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010936.jpg, 98KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 22:14:03 No.2850285 Report

Quoted By: >>2850343

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010937.jpg, 137KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 22:15:56 No.2850287 Report

Quoted By: >>2850343

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010943.jpg, 151KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 22:16:57 No.2850288 Report

Quoted By:

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010938.jpg, 159KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 22:17:57 No.2850291 Report

Quoted By:

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO L1010941.jpg, 111KiB, 1000x673

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Sat 28 May 2016 22:18:58 No.2850292 Report

Quoted By: >>2850343 >>2850865

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 May 2016 22:33:04 No.2850306 Report

Quoted By: >>2850316

>>2850076
Your photographs are shit, please stop.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 May 2016 22:42:25 No.2850316 Report

Quoted By:

>>2850306
ignore this retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 May 2016 22:49:39 No.2850322 Report

Quoted By: >>2850505

>>2850097
>MUH SHARPNESS

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 May 2016 23:10:22 No.2850343 Report

Quoted By:

>>2850257
>>2850285
>>2850287
>>2850292
These are p cool. That banding and those lines still kind of bother me tho. Was flash forbidden there or why did you shoot these without it?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 May 2016 00:38:54 No.2850412 Report

Quoted By:

For the most part these are fucking rad. You could condense them down to ~15 of the best and have a really nice set of images. Some of the best stuff I've seen on /p/ in awhile.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 May 2016 01:30:44 No.2850440 Report

Quoted By:

why does OP cherry pick?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO OPisafaggot.gif, 1MiB, 230x192

Anonymous Sun 29 May 2016 02:28:54 No.2850497 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 May 2016 02:39:15 No.2850505 Report

Quoted By:

>>2850322
Muh memes

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 May 2016 15:49:00 No.2850865 Report

Quoted By:

>>2850292
Horrifying.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 May 2016 06:26:34 No.2851323 Report

Quoted By: >>2851795

>>2850076
is this the trump rally in anaheim?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 May 2016 10:31:24 No.2851417 Report

Quoted By: >>2851795

>>2850076
you had an m8 and you managed to take these utter shit show pictures. get a new hobby

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 May 2016 11:09:33 No.2851427 Report

Quoted By: >>2851795 >>2851822 >>2851831 >>2854686

>>2850097
Perhaps the complete lack of technical merit displayed in these photos is a meta commentary on the Trump campaign's lack of a coherent platform or focus.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 May 2016 11:48:15 No.2851438 Report

Quoted By: >>2851795

>>2850076
What interesting subject matter must be at that event. Shame the photographer is trash.

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym

Yes, but what about my sensor's resolution? !!QFnBSfh82Ym Mon 30 May 2016 20:11:39 No.2851795 Report

Quoted By: >>2851811

>>2851323
ye

>>2851417
>>2851427
>>2851438
stay jealous, nerds

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 May 2016 20:28:03 No.2851811 Report

Quoted By: >>2852043 >>2852296

>>2851795
You're just one of the many people who come to /p/ posting utter shit because you think doing this and that makes you a real photographer and better than any P&S user but everything you do just makes things worse, and when /p/ points it out you can't just accept that /p/ is right about the bad choices you made.

/p/ is always right

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 May 2016 20:34:49 No.2851822 Report

Quoted By:

>>2851427

Go away Hillary.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 May 2016 20:41:02 No.2851831 Report

Quoted By:

>>2851427
huh, really makes you think.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 May 2016 01:48:09 No.2852043 Report

Quoted By: >>2852293

>>2851811
>/p/ is always right
I fucking hate you and I fucking hate this place.

But, this statement is mostly true. /p/ is an angry hell hole of shitty photographers who care more about gear than content, but we know who we are and we are generally pretty good at identifying shit as shit. That's the only value of this place: your shit will be called shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 May 2016 10:13:46 No.2852292 Report

Quoted By:

>>2850086
>nothing new here
so? these pics are objectively very very good

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 May 2016 10:16:16 No.2852293 Report

Quoted By: >>2853320

>>2852043
>being this delusional
/p/ has absolute shit taste, as evidenced again and again
get real

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 May 2016 10:19:29 No.2852296 Report

Quoted By: >>2852332

>>2851811
do you realize that sharpness doesn't equal good photo?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 May 2016 11:54:22 No.2852312 Report

Quoted By:

awesome stuff as per usual :)

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 May 2016 12:03:01 No.2852319 Report

Quoted By: >>2852385 >>2852399 >>2853215

>>2850078
>>2850077
>>2850082
>>2850083
>>2850085

these photos are horrible

overblown subject with completely dark bg wtf is this?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 May 2016 12:18:49 No.2852332 Report

Quoted By: >>2852377

>>2852296
I never mentioned sharpness so I assume you replied to the wrong person

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 May 2016 13:47:28 No.2852377 Report

Quoted By:

>>2852332
yes sorry I meant
>>2850097

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 May 2016 13:58:08 No.2852385 Report

Quoted By:

>>2852319
weegee

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 May 2016 14:30:20 No.2852399 Report

Quoted By:

>>2852319
>overblown subject
reported for fat shaming, shitlord

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 01 Jun 2016 12:19:18 No.2853203 Report

Quoted By:

>>2850257
lel

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 01 Jun 2016 12:53:30 No.2853215 Report

Quoted By: >>2853246

>>2852319
>not understanding the aesthetics of poorly exposed retro photography
Fug off m8 k

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 01 Jun 2016 13:45:26 No.2853246 Report

Quoted By:

>>2853215
>buy a Leica
>purposefully make your photos look like a shitty old point and shoot because "le retro 80's maymay xD"

If you want your photos to look like that, why not just buy an old point and shoot and not waste your money on a leica?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 01 Jun 2016 15:29:59 No.2853320 Report

Quoted By:

>>2852293
Oh sweetie. Did somebody not like your wide open picture of your cat and hurt your feewings?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 Jun 2016 13:11:26 No.2854650 Report

Quoted By: >>2854679

>>2850076
How did you spend this much on a Leica M8 and still be shit at photography.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 Jun 2016 13:14:25 No.2854653 Report

Quoted By:

>>2850099
Alan Tudyk = Pirate Pete from Dodgeball. If you've watched a Ben Stiller movie from the early 2000s you know who that is

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 Jun 2016 13:16:10 No.2854654 Report

Quoted By:

>>2850099
>>2850101
Man, cool fucking sensor damage ala white lines. Maybe get your sensor looked at

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 Jun 2016 13:52:19 No.2854679 Report

Quoted By:

>>2854650

Leica M8 is hobo tier Leica.

Anyway this style is done to death now, try steel wool time lapses or something more creative.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 Jun 2016 13:54:46 No.2854680 Report

Quoted By: >>2854685

>>2850126
>>2850130
>>2850134
>ISO 1250
That's why your images are so noisy and grainy.
Sorry, tripfag, but my inkjet fax machine spits out better images.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 Jun 2016 13:58:56 No.2854685 Report

Quoted By: >>2854692

>>2854680
Who cares about noise and grain? Look at the fucking content of a photo you worthless technician.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 Jun 2016 14:00:29 No.2854686 Report

Quoted By:

>>2851427
I was Cruz missile, but after reading this, now I'm Team Hillary.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 Jun 2016 14:05:43 No.2854692 Report

Quoted By: >>2854695

>>2854685
I use a 40-inch 4K television for a monitor. Anything larger than thumbnail size makes so much noise visible in the image that those photos look like photocopies of photocopies of photocopies of photos.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 Jun 2016 14:08:36 No.2854694 Report

Quoted By:

>>2850134
bottom left corner, it's Bernie. I'd recognize that loudmouth jew shyster anywhere

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 Jun 2016 14:08:59 No.2854695 Report

Quoted By:

>>2854692
>looking at 1000 pixel files on a 40" 4K monitor
So your equipment is shit for your usage, and his output isn't meant for the way you're using it... and it's his fault somehow?

>The turn in this 25 mph stretch of road isn't graded at 25 degrees, and I fly off the side when I'm going by at 140 mph, so the road is fucking shit at being a road. Learn to road, road. Fuck.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 07 Jun 2016 14:37:48 No.2858072 Report

Quoted By:

>>2850275
Fuck me I love those colors and tones, is that natural fuji stuff or did you lightroom that?

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

TRUMP RALY xDDDDDD