>>2858251I'm a little bored by this photo... Perhaps a new subject.
>>2858266This is great from a graphic design perspective. I love the layers and the separation of color.
>>2858278The color is crazy bland for such an interesting landscape. Try turning saturation up.
>>2858285Not sure what the fuck happened here.
>>2858307Like the reflection but up your creep factor by really sneaking up on these two strangers so they take up more of the frame. Alternatively crop.
>>2858329You blew the highlights );
>>2858343Need a faster or slower shutter this is just strange, he's blurred but only a little.
>>2858344Love it, I would have moved to the right a little so the tree separates from the barrels more though.
>>2858419This has been done.
>>28584511.5 thumbs up.
>>2858514Check out the cover to the Marshall Mathers LP it's your photo but with better lighting and a subject.
>>2858561(:
>>2858571Go get some bricks make that hole smaller and then you have a photo.
>>2858572Natgeo minus the skill and dedication.
>>2858573This is a fun moment in real life but not worth a photo.
>>2858576Crop this to the top right and I think you have a great landscape and sky.
>>2858579Just no. No.
>>2858638Neat but weird horizon line position.
>>2858692All three have lost detail in the darks.
Other than that I really like the subjects in 1&3.
>>2858708This is not Barcelona it's a plant. If I have to take your word for it, the location doesn't matter much.
>>2858721Newspapers top left fuck it up.
>>2859320Torrent photoshop and colorbalance that shit.
>>2859327This is bad. No clear subject, blurry cars, boring buildings. Go out take some more photos.
>>2859330Shit.
>>2859331Lol I thought they were all parked. In this case I think a slower shutter would have been better to show the movement.
>>2859338Now all you need to do is edit out al those small buildings and you have a good photo.
>>2859375Fucking cool photo. Focus fucked up or fog???
This is a critique. Bye.
