>>2859872>more iso>more noise>more noise reduction>image less sharp>rating less accurate>higher resolution>less noise>better definition (generally)>more accurate ratingThink of it this way: a lens that's utterly terrible on sides and corner, but good in center, could be a really good lens on a low resolution camera where you can't even notice it being shit, or on a crop sensor where those imperfections can't even be captured, but on a high resolution camera you are largely limited by your lens because every imperfection is easy to see. It comes to a point where, depending on camera, a bad lens can look the exact same as a good lens. It's why we have so many bad lenses today; cameras are just now to the point where lens sharpness is becoming a big deal in most cases.
It's not that big a deal unless you use adapted, old, or cheapo lenses. Most shots that are actually printed will be printed small enough not to matter on a high resolution camera.
Individual lens tests are useful. One lens is worth using on a low resolution camera, while it's not worth using on a high resolution camera.
