>>2877220It's not a matter of being defensive. I mean, you're being equally defensive *of* your opinion.
It is simply that you are categorically wrong and are attempting to *seem* as though you have relevant commentary. A common tactic, to be fair. Many don't even realize they do it.
You need to develop a better understanding of what photography is about if you think exposure is objective, that a cow should be a particular value. You are failing to take a photo in for its entirety, instead focusing a mock-analytical eye at it to fulfill what you think you're supposed to be doing (and what you think critique is, lol)
That last response of mine wasn't defensiveness. It was dismissal. Your hanging chad is in.
