>>2878587are you lost, bro?
>>2878537>>2879045>>2879046>>2879086>>2879089>>2879330>>2879332woah slow down guys, please keep the fighting to a minimum. for the cathedral shot I honestly had no intention of perspective correcting so I pointed my camera upwards like that, resulting in the distortion.
for some of my other architecture shots though, like the apartment buildings set I did step back as far as I could (believe me when I say this, those buildings were situated in little alleys so I literally had my back against the wall while shooting those) and tried to keep the camera as close to vertical as possible while still enveloping the whole building in the image, all for an easier time correcting them in post. oh and I used the samyang 12f2 which is like one of the widest lenses for fuji too.
>>2878652>>2879056>>2879082thanks a lot for the input, guys! I agree with
>>2879056, though I hardly ever crop my images on the sides like that, it's like a personal taboo thing for me because ratios narrower than 3:2 that aren't square just look kinda wrong to me. it's a really really personal thing haha
>>2879044all of the images in this thread were shot in RAW except for the long exposure ones (because fuji can't into RAW at base ISO 100), I edit in LR using my custom preset: bump up contrast and a bit of clarity and desaturation, lift shadows and dim highlights for an expanded dynamic range, than apply a curve that sort of gives it a bit of "fade" (lifted blacks) and some other minor stuffs. also some of these had split-toning for cooler shadows which has become a permanent thing for my preset now.
//I've been working more on the overpass long exposure idea for the last 2 days but the images keeps turning out looking like ass, partly due to the flare, and that it's too bright up there for anything longer than 15 secs. maybe it's time to think about getting an ND filter. also next time I'll bring the zoom lens and try shooting narrower.
