>>2877065Depends what you are shooting, for amateurs I would never recommend a DSLR any more regardless of what they shoot.
For pros I wouldn't tell anyone to switch to mirrorless YET, those that do it (including myself) can make an informed decision on whether it would be suitable or not.
For example, in my case I do not need high ISO performance nor do I need peak continuous AF performance.. I do need a good amount of DR however neither the Fuji cameras or my D4 had the amount of DR that I would want, whether the D4 had a fraction more was redundant because it wasn't enough anyway.
Without going into every specification and feature, for what I get paid to shoot DSLRs were offering nothing over a Fuji setup, I can honestly say the only sacrifice I made switching to Fuji from a pro Nikon kit (for what I shoot) was battery life. However, I purchased my whole new setup for less than half the price of my older Nikon setup, the Fuji setup is infinitely lighter and easier to carry (which is beneficial when yout job requires you to haul the equipment around every single day all day for the whole year to make a living) the quality of the images from the Fuji cameras and lenses is just as good, build quality is excellent etc etc etc
The point is, unless you need peak performance of a specific feature or function then there isn't reason to purchase a more bulky, more expensive, heavier DSLR setup especially when the performance gap between systems gets smaller every few months.
