>>2876428I honestly am curious if you purposefully put her over the word "trash." I mean, what message are you trying to send?
>>2876436This is a dark phone of nothing. This doesn't look moody or atmospheric or whatever bullshit aesthetic you were going for. This is just flat out underexposed.
>>2876440It's a common shot, but you did fine with it. It's not a great version of this, but it's adequate. Too much sky and the hiker's feet are too lose to the edge of the frame, but other than that it's alright. It should get a dozen or so likes on Facebook and be completely forgotten.
>>2876446Yep, that's a shit, unfocused, grainy as fuck shot of cats doing nothing with a massive light leak. Good job. Honestly, why the fuck even post this? Why do you think this is worth anybody's time?
>>2876458>I posted it again for some constructive criticism.It's boring. There's nothing here. It's two plants with shit floating in the air. There's no real indication of what where supposed to be looking at or why. Even if you just take it as an abstract shot of shit floating in the air, there are no interest shapes or composition. Why did you take this shot? Why do you like it? You want constructive criticism, tell me why you shot it and what you wanted us to see.
>>2876459It's a sunset. It's no different than any other sunset. The colors are fine. The composition with the trees makes the whole thing feel imbalanced and lopsided. Other than just an exercise of trying to expose a sunset there's not really anything here.
>>2876467This could've been a killer shot, but the composition and balance is really uneven. You were standing too far to the left of center, and it shows. You've done the best you could with perspective from where you were standing, but it's clear that you weren't centered. If you're trying to get a centered shot like this, you need to be fucking dead on.
