>>2893696For the love of dog don't try to mold your sense of aesthethics to /p/'s.
So many here have absolutely shit taste in photos.
Remember this if you ever post a picture for critique. If someone says to do this or that to make the picture better, take a few moments to think about whether that actually makes sense. Most people who offer opinions on what to change offer no arguments or explanation for it, except usually holding up the rule of thirds as if it was required by law.
I'd rather recommend you do as
>>2893701 says and look to famous photographers for inspiration, while still asking yourself what makes their pictures good.
