>>2896737>If you adapt meme4/3 you are basically defeating the purpose of meme4/3 which is its size and compactness. Listen bud, FF or ASP-C lenses lose to MFT either on compactness and weight because with native or smaller lenses, MFT can always go below, or they lose in lens selection, because MFT can adapt anything. Even old CCTV lenses.
>APS-C is better in low light and has higher megapixels.And there we have the pixel-pinchers
Just wrap your head around this: 4k is 8 Megapixels.
And 8k will probably never come outside the hardcore enthusiast market because 4k is already on retina-levels of resolution in almost all viewing scenarios.
> It's hard not to get motion blur when you are shooting at 1/10th of a second.unless you got good stabilization. And bigger sensors are also harder to stabilize
>If you want to shoot video, buy a GoPro or a JVC Camcorder.Someone doesn't know shit. Also, what good is that argument if you make the argument that DSLRs have been used in Hollywood production?
>No Hollywood film will ever be shot on a Mfturds.What a retarded argument. A Smart will also never be used as a towing-vehicle and people STILL use them.
>The Sony and Fuji systems already can compete with the mfturds in regards to the weight.They really can't. You can get stellar MFT performers weighing less than 150g with hood and filter.
Bigger sensor = bigger and longer lenses = more need for sturdy material = more glass and metal = more weight
Bigger Cameras always lose out in terms of weight all else being equal.
Some people are just okay with trading a few lux in lightperfomance and a few megapixels for better niche usability.
Not everyone needs to own a hummvee.
Get out of your mindset and deal with it.
Pic related. It's you.
>>2896758>works in another MFT related thing>considers the people using MFT to be the shillsThe cognitive dissonance is strong with this one.
