>>2902313Unless you're really fucking gay for weather sealing the 1.4 is probably the way to go. I don't have much hope for the 23/2. The X100 lens isn't that astounding and it looks as if this is just made to appeal to the people who love the 35/2 who complain about the 1.4 being big.
It really is a beautiful lens, complain about the size all you want you girly faggot, but compare it to other large aperture 35mm eqvs with autofocus and you'll see it's a respectable size.
I simply don't see them sacrificing size for image quality this time around.
>>2902377dude, git gud.
>>2902350Canon already nearly won the game with their compact 35 eqv.
>over paying for sup par productsOnly someone who's used a Sony or Sony Zeiss lens could experience this ;^)
