>>2902397>• Variety of lenses There are definitely "pro" compacts
>• Depth of field control...
>• Low light performanceThere are a surprising number of people who wish CCD were still used instead of CMOS even though CCD is shit in low light.
>• connectivity with lighting setupsThis is less important that you think. If you can get one light working with a camera, you can always slave the rest.
>• image quality (no cameraphone can hope to resolve an image in the way a large lens can at the same pixel count)Lenses are the final resolving element, eh? Also, IQ isn't as important as you think it is. Why not look up how long Canon's flagship 1D system was APS-H and not full frame.
>• Tilting and shiftingCanon's really the only company that does these right without going third party, and if you really need movements, you're shooting LF.
>• analogue density shifting and polarisation without using filter simulation....you can put those in front of basically any lens on any body.
>• capture speed (up to 20fps in commercial cameras now)capture speed has never been as important as either wake up speed or delay from shutter release, and very few cameras can hit 10 fps with raw.
>• processing versatility with raw filesYou can get raw with cell phone cameras
>• Macro photographyeasier to achieve on a smaller sensor
>• Bracketingcan be done with third party apps
>• Lens hoodseh...sure?
>• manual focusingIt's mostly amateurs who wank over manual focus.
>• Burst flash photographywhich is dependant on the strobes being used and has nothing at all to do with the camera.
