>>2904016>>2904017Why are they shit?
Well, first of all, you allowed the camera to make the decisions here (ap priority) and as a result, all of your shadows are severely underexposed. I guess it's possible that you did this intentionally through processing, but if you did, they look like shit anyway. It looks like a bad version of VSCO with tones that don't work and everything looks boringly undersaturated.
Aside from that, you either don't understand composition rules or you are intentionally breaking rule of thirds to be edgy - either way, each photo is framed and cropped terribly.
>>2903402This one I'd give a pass on the latter, though. Well framed - it's just exposed and processed like shit.
