>>2905925I'm 50% sure you're trolling but just in case
>shooting outside looking in through green tinted glassI'm talking about the entire set, not just the posted image. And tinted glass alone obviously wouldn't produce this tone, I just think they've been edited nicely.
>These girls are only shot by the top fashion photographers on the very best tethered full frame DSLRs on a professional set with makeup, wardrobe, hair, craft services, and so on.>did you really think that this was film? That these were candids shot on the fly by some hipster nu-male and his collection of leftover film from the 1980s?Welcome to the new era of celebrity. you think these
https://www.instagram.com/p/BJOdnF7BEei/ https://www.instagram.com/p/BJGH1UiBKy7/ etc were taken by a pro with a tethered full frame?
Regarding this particular set the article says:
>Tagging along was her friend, the young New York photographer Renell Medrano, a recent graduate of Parsons School of Design>You're trying to read to much into it, those are reflections in the window and her skin pressed flat against the glassobviously I didn't think the reflections and ass on the glass were irregularities in the processing. I was talking about other photos in the set like this one
>>2905893 around the edge, there's a damaged film effect that's been photoshopped in.
