>>2908788Fucked up exposure. The car is the subject, not the sky. You've got clouds exposed, but the car is fucking black. Shooting in midday sun like this, you can't have it both ways. Also, composition is dildos. It looks like the car is there by accident, not on purpose.
>>2908789>power linesWhy? Why the fuck do people persist in doing this when they're just starting out? Is it the lines? Is it the simplicity of the subject? Also, exposure is shit again. The trees and power lines are too dark. If you want them in silhouette, then go all the way. This almost-but-not-quite exposure is garbage.
>>2908790A muddled train wreck. If you're going to shoot a butterfly, then nail your focus and use your knowledge of exposure and depth of field to isolate it. In a B&W shot like this, it's just lost.
>>2908792Honestly, that light was just garbage. You didn't have a change. Also, too much head room. Also, all the other random people walking about are distracting.
>>2908794At least it's straight on one side. Needs PC on the right side, though. Yet another shot of nicely exposed clouds and dark shit elsewhere.
You know what? All my comments apply to the rest of the shots. These are just snapshits. Obviously, something caught your eye in each scene, but you didn't use a damn tool available to you as a photographer to capture whatever it was you saw. You just looked at a thing and went "oooh! pertty! [snap!]"
Also, there's no point in these being in B&W. You've got to have stronger composition and shapes and light to use B&W well. These are just insta-art bullshit shots.
>>2908803>everything in the read fits the theme>THEN A FUCKING MODERN TRAINDon't do that.
