>>2912171What aren't you happy about?
* I'm anal so I would level it (looking at the far background where there's water).
* Color is good. Nice mix of gold/yellow, blue, and greens/browns. (The blue in the sky actually does remind me of Provia blue.)
* Saturation seems about right. Some would like less; Ken Rockwell would like more. I like it for the scene.
Of course our monitors are all different. The sat on my monitor is dialed down to match my printer. On other monitors it may be over the top.
* Good detail/sharpness and DoF (at least at web size).
* Good blend of foreground/background exposure. (Whether you actually blended frames, or used a GND, or just managed to pull out that much data.)
* Love the "glow" in the clouds and light rays across the back mountain.
It's not "top 10 landscape of all time" but it's pretty good.
