>>2913113the left is nothing like the original scene either, you dipshit retard.
Human eyes are not the same as Complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor sensors, nor the same as an individual camera lens.
The pupil is opening and closing and doing an HDR synthesizing hundreds of images into one perception.
The effect is a dynamic range more than twice as high as your CMOS sensor can provide, meaning no unedited RAW file is ever representative of the image seen by the human eye.
Perception is also multi-focal, the lens can constantly adjust to combine in-focus details from half a dozen different regions, while leaving uninteresting features like grass out of focus, quite unlike your left fake file that can only ever have 1 region in focus.
The human mind also does active white-balance adjustments and many other tricks that correct the received visual information to match the viewer's past experiences. This will let us experience the trees as a richer green and the sky as a more saturated blue than the values imagined by the sensor algorithms.
It is possible to over-correct the fake RAW file that was taken straight from your camera, and make it just as fake in the opposite direction, but it the RAW in itself is not correct or true at all to the human sensory/perceptual experience. (Which is what photography was created for.)
