>>2916303When it comes to hoes without clothes, some degree of softness (like he's doing with the focus) can be beneficial.
There are few things in the world more unattractive than a 50 megapixel shot of some needle-junky 'actresses' bunghole hairs.
There's some happy medium area in-between the distracting nature of low-resolution artifact-filled nudes and high-resolution eye-bleaching nudes.
Soft focus avoids the horrors of high-res hookers while also avoiding the hideous artifacting that comes from using a really low res camera pipeline like a cheap webcam's jpegs. It's a win-win.
The first image I think isn't enough of a compromise. Go halfway between that too-soft image and normal focus and it'd be perfect.
Image #2 feels more correct, though even that might be better toned just a tad down.
