>>2917332>I mean, you do realize that I have no way of knowing precisely what lens you were using, right?Uh...yeah, you absolutely do, lmao.
>And because of that I can't know that your lens is one of the oddballs that is most sharp at f/5.6 instead of the f/8-f/11 where most lenses have their sharpest point,5.6 is sharper than f8-f11 on APS-C for virtually all lenses, we only go to f8-f11 often because diffraction still isn't awful yet there, and when you have a very deep desired DoF, its useful. Lacking a foreground element, its unnecessary even if the amount is small.
>which could have easily been addressed with "this lens is sharpest at f/5.6 so there's no point in me forcing myself to use slower shutter speeds" instead of some condescending, bullshit diatribe laden with projection and strawmanningYou're so unaware of your own tone. One day you may learn yet.
> You know, how actual people converse in real life?Like "...why?", an ellipsis in 'real life' usually translates to a pretentious pause and a sneer. Perhaps follow your own advice on speaking to people as you would in the "real world."
>Or people other than you because I suspect if anyone ever asks you a question about what you're doing you fly off the handle to prove just how much "better" you are.You should really get out more, haha.
