>>2919861girls now exactly when their ass looks sexy in yoga pants. generally most girls know very well how they look. if a girl says 'I dont have a very good XYZ feature' then trust her, she doesn't indeed. and vice versa.
>>2919008but this does not mean one may intemidate the private space of a girl in puplic by isolating her or parts of her on a picture.
let me elaborate why: as often in law this a question of conflicting rights and which of these are to valuable as more important than the other.
1.) every person has the right to express artistic creation in puplic space.
2.) every person has the right to decide if a picture of him/her may be made or not.
now there is a quite simple and logical principle: if the useage of one of the conflicting rights does not completely contradict the other, the conflicting right is the more important.
which means: in case somebody uses right 1.), is there a way 2.) can still be applicaple? ... No, of course not. The moment you shot the pic the right of deciding about it is void.
but in case somebody insist on right 2.), is there a way 1.) can still be applicable? ... Yes, absolutely. actually there are many ways. the artist can ask for permission beforehand. the artist can choose not to isolate one person. if needed the artist can engage a model and place her in public. etc. etc. ...
therefore the right to decide about being pictured or not is as to be valued higher.
case closed
