>>2923981>Absolutely, because large companies bother about all of the displays they use being calibrated The fuck you chatting son, the point is big companies will use pro photographers with colour calibrated gear.
>Somebody with a fucked up display would still claim your colors are offAre you on crack?
If someone's monitor was so fucked up that correctly coloured images look so bad that they feel the need to call it out, then every fucking image would look wrong to them, unless it was done on a monitor that was equally as fucked.
How is this so hard to comprehend?
>I said if you calibrated your display in daylight (during daytime, without artificial lightsources involved) and process a photo when it's dark outside with your room/table lighted by an artificial light source with a temperature lower than 5000K, your processed photos are going to have wrong colorsAgain, the fuck you talking about, my advice was to find a dark corner and make sure no light hits the screen directly. The colour of the backlight will overpower any reflected light hitting the screen. Also, nearly all colour calibrators come with an always on sensor to change brightness on the fly, if you had a calibrated monitor you would know this.
>>2925295Do you have the specs for fuji screens?
How much of the argb gamut do they cover?
Well, I've got an xe1 here and I can tell you without a shadow of a doubt - the gamut ain't great and the accuracy is questionable at best, the glossy screen doesn't help matters. Put next to my a7ii the fuji is a clear loser for rear screen and evf.
>>2925339That's a closed system, what if you want to print larger? The results from the print shop will be completely different to what you were expecting.
