>>2928945What's shit about canon crop?
A rabal at base iso outperforms an xpro2 at iso 800, has better lenses, better af, better battery and ergonomics, arguably a better jpeg engine. The old ccd models are especially good, if you want a ccd body.
>>2929013>getting jpegs right implying any of these look "right", they look like tommy the pinball wizard got his hands on nik effects.
>>2929021>filmfags get the look without understanding colourYou've never shot film, or processed paper, you can make huge variations to your colour in the dark room.
Also film is A E S T H E T I C, isi's shots have an aesthetic, if she had greater control over her colour she could create some sort of pleasing colour palette, however she's not got past fucking with sliders, didn't do very good, then tried to make jpeg non meme and failed.
Can you name an artist apart from ken who uses jpegs?
>>2929075>learn how to meterNo need, the evf shows a wysiwyg of the image with the jpeg settings. She just scrolls the shutter speed back and forth until it looks shit, petrified of blowing any whites.
>>2929079>jpeg presets require more knowledge than being skilled at lr/psLol, you keep believing that isi.
>>2929080Yo ambush, these are considerably worse than your photos, you don't get to catch a break and you're not a massive cunt to everyone on the board. It's nothing to do with gender, loads of guys get shit flung at them.
>>2929169>low voltage, thin screen of unknown specs and not calibratedNo, this is not a suitable environment to analyse photos, it's a quick preview and a way to chimp for sharpness.
>>2929228If you have to not use a pc, sonys can wirelessly tether to a phone/tablet (which can have their screens calibrated, and the screens are of a much higher quality.)
So you can then edit your raws in your mobile image editing app in a colour controlled environment.
It's a shame as fuji cameras can produce really lovely tones if edited carefully. Pic related
