>>2934816>perhaps but perhaps notBut being realistic, and knowing Hasselblad's reputation as a bunch of photo Jews, it's almost certain to be a rebadged Fuji.
>they probably gave fuji a wish list of specs, did their own firmware and final exterior designYes, this is certainly the extent of their work however I doubt they did the firmware. They probably directed its development but we haven't really seen if the firmware is different except maybe the startup logo yet...
>they also probably put limitations on some or all hasselblad tech that fuji could use in the gfx50I quite seriously doubt it but anything's possible.
It's OK - Hasselblad is saying "We know this is just a Fuji, but if you want to feel slightly more important than your buddies please buy our premium-priced product that's secretly identical but probably has worse and slower service and support."
See that's one of Hassy's problems - their support is for total shit for such expensive cameras.
The other is that they basically have nothing left but the brand.
