>>2938036When they say "significant disadvantages" what they mean is that they have fat sausage fingers, an inability to read a manual and not enough money.
Sony is for beautiful, literate, wealthy people.
The facts are, technically they have the best bodies and oem lenses, and it's the smallest ff body on the market. Of course people are going to be bitter, imagine training your whole life to be a swimmer, finally make it to the olympics and 2012 phelps is in the lane next to you, the inability to be truly competitive is infuriating.
Check this faggot out
>>29372971.
Their sensors are the best in the world
2.
Completely untrue, i went from a7 to a7ii, which had the same sensor, because i wanted ibis, better af and the matte body. Other companies release the same bodys year after year with 3 year old sony sensor tech in, still no canikon with ibis, what a joke.
3.
What's wrong with the 85 f1.4, 70-200 f4 or f2.8, 55 f1. 8, 90 f2. 8, 50 f1.4, 16-35 f4, any of the batis or loxia range, tokina have their new firin range, sigma have said there's fe lenses coming. Apart from a tilt-shift and pro sports options what's missing? And more importantly why are sonys fe lenses consistently outperforming their canikon equivalents?
4.
Af used to be bad, the ii range has fixed this though.
5.
oh no, i have to pop a tiny spare battery in my pocket.
6.
Don't live in america, fucking moron.
