>>2943819Look at mirrorless.
Same sensor (and image quality) as a DSLR, but in a much smaller package.
I'd recommend X-T2, a6300/a6500, or a7ii for raw performance.
Or a6000 for the best value.
>X-T2Looks cool as fuck, has a great sensor, and is easy to use. It is rather expensive though, and while most ranges are covered and it is pretty solid, it's lens selection is limited. It also can not autofocus adapted lenses.
>a6300/a6500Slightly simpler layout, but still with a great sensor. Autofocus is fastest of all mirrorless on the a6500.Just as pricey as the X-T2. It can also autofocus adapted lenses. Sony is also making less APS-C lenses for their e-mount, which means you have to use their fullframe ones. Their fullframe lenses are fantastic, but more expensive and rather larger than their equivalent APS-C. Menu system is not as clear as it could be.
>a7iiOnly FF mirrorless from what I listed. Rumored to get an upgrade next month. Has FF sensor which means better lowlight performance. There is also a solid lineup of FF e-mount lenses. It can also autofocus adapted lenses. It's menu system is better than the a6k series and has a usability update coming soon. It is expensive, and so are the lenses. It's autofocus is also slightly slower than the other mirrorless I mentioned. Combined with most FE lenses, it is a rather large setup, still smaller than a DSLR, but larger than a mirrorless.
>a6000Best value. Half the price of the other mentioned bodies, but still with a great sensor/performance. Has same lens lineup issues as the other a6k lenses. It can not autofocus adapted lenses as fast as the others, however.
