>>2942340>they should have fixedLol, what? Who said anything about "fixing" anything? I'm pointing out that it's within a limited scope of comparative context and tells us very little about the lens in the real world, and factors in even less the most important part; usability.
I am not expecting you to write a snappy comeback or anything to me, I do realize you are either far too gone or too soon arrived in your adventures in gearfaggotry to actually understand the greater marketing dynamics I'm talking about.
I'm not accusing Zeiss of lying or anything for you to need to take "their word" over mine. I'm just telling you that you're a clueless young gearfriend that cares far too much about entirely meaningless benchmark comparisons, and that there is a direct correlation between your ignorance (to which those forms of comparison are most marketable) and their intentions as a corporate, money-making entity.
Sony-Zeiss are not designing lenses with the final output in mind, or with usability in mind. They are currently designing with specs and datasheets in mind because they intimately understand they've mostly adopted former entry level DSLR users to whom these things were already the native language.
No one's lying to anyone, you don't have to anthropomorphize corporate actions so vividly, Sony is just marketing to gearfriends primarily, and it shows in who now carries their banner.
Remember lad: no matter how many 55mm lenses you own, you still haven't taken a picture with them today.
