This is a general comment which applies almost universally to the entire set:
Successful pictures of a street artist require two things: (1) The artist, and (2) the thing they are doing. This entire series has neither. This is literally a series of gloved hands.
A single one of these shots may have worked in the context of a better series, but as it is it's just the same fucking shot over and over and over again from different angles.
We don't know who this person is, where this person is, or what, really they're doing (besides painting). I know it's a street artist because you told me, but that's the only reason. For fuck's sake, we don't even see any real finished product. All we get are sharply angled snippets of the paintings. If I can't see this person or what they're doing or where they're doing it, why should I can?
Close-ups aren't bad. Showing the detail of the technique isn't bad. But when that's all it is, there's nothing really there.
>>2941281>close up of anonymous gloved hands mostly covering painting>>2941282>close up of anonymous gloved hands wiping newspaper on canvas>>2941283>close up of anonymous gloved hands with spray paint>>2941284>literally the same shot as >>2941282>>2941285>close up of anonymous gloved hands with spray paint>>2941287>literally the same shot as >>2941287>>2941289>close up shot of gloved hands paintingOH! We're looking at a landscape painting!
Also, your processing is flat and dull. It doesn't look dark and artsy. It doesn't look like it was a cloudy or dreary day. It doesn't look moody or faded or retro. It just looks flat and boring.
