So, you shitposted as anon any lately, Alex?
Nothing exceptional in this thread, I'm afraid.
>>2942372Why you chose to take another photo of a rock mirrored in a lake instead of a tighter shot of the much more interesting rim-lit details to the left is beyond me.
>>2942374This is good.
>>2942375Very sloppily composed for someone of your stature. The cluster of trees could be centered better, and the tree cut off on the left omitted.
>>2942376Not as sloppy as the last, but still not great. Lower right brush is very soft, and you've again bisected a tree with your frame on the left. A square of just the center area of this frame with that one exceptional tree in the middle would be far stronger. You're better than this.
>>2942377You've taken better versions of this before.
>>2942378Now there's a proper photograph, good job. I might buy a copy of this.
>>2942380Too much yellow and not enough green to excuse you for using such a bad cliche.
>>2942384it feels like you didn't pay much attention to the placement of the crop tracks. Why didn't you frame further from the left?
>>2942522Come the fuck on Alex, why is this panoramic? A standard crop of only the rocks, in black and white or velvia either, would be a far and away stronger photograph.
Not going to rub your nob, everyone else is doing that for you. Still proud of you on quitting your job and making this full time, but you appear to be regressing in light of admiration.
