>>2944792Ok. I wondered whether you'd plucked photos from the facebook of a person you don't like so that you can enjoy the derision they receive.
Obviously, the fact that I was suspicious of that will tell you what my own opinion of this set as 'photography'
That being said, good on you for posting some OC, OP. Now I'll try to be constructive.
>>2944252First of all, why do you think this is interesting? It's an underground. literally thousands of people see it every day and your photo adds absolutely nothing interesting. I'm sure some people doing something interesting could turn it into an interesting street shot. Secondly, if you'd got a foot or two lower, the little round ceiling lights wouldn't be in a straight line, which would be a more interesting dramatic composition imo.
>>2944255I expose for skin tones, so this looks under to me. Also just pretty boring, which is a shame because she's a good subject. Same with
>>2944256 - again, I think getting lower would have been a good idea with this second shot.
>>2944258Bad. It's hazy and not sharp. Even cropping could have improved this, too. If you had made the crowd fill the frame it would look a lot more dramatic. It looks boring. Which it absolutely is not.
>>2944260What is different about this photo from the photos every fucking tourist in Covent Garden takes of it every single day?
>>2944262Nice crust. I want to eat steak. But a boring photo with bad lighting.
Are you using Lightroom, OP? If not, get it, and fiddle with every photo before posting. Each of these feels distinctly unfinished
