>>2945521Panofag here.
You've run into one of the major problems of try to compose pano, but before I talk about that I'm going to take a moment to talk about the aspect ratio used. The ratio you're currently using is 4.15:1, standard AR's for pano are generally 2.35:1, 2.34:1 (MF 135 pano) and 2.7:1 (xpan). While you think that more is better, less is more can be applied here. The image appears too wide and is leading to major problems with the composition.
Now onto the meaty stuff.
Centre based pano is great, it's a fun way to compose, but you need to try and balance it when you do. This image suffers because a lack of balance. While you'd think the focus would be down the path, it's drawn to the tree stump on the left. This is because the right of your image has nothing going on and is a void of black. When looking at the image right to left your eye is drawn to the center where it doesn't stay, it hops along across the horizontal trunk farther on and forces your eye to the knot on the left. The issue with that is that it's incredibly unnatural to have an image pull bottom right to top left.
Since this is no doubt a digital stitch/ a crop from a larger frame, I'd probably recommend that you go out and try to compose with pano in your mind, know what AR and know the limitations of going wider than the standard. Visualise the negative space and how your eye will be pulled across the image.
While some will say, oh nice! that's a nice photo anon! They're doing it entirely because the photo is panoramic and not because the composition. At this stage your pano work is still gimmick tier. Put some work into it, You'll get there.
This is probably a bit more than the "too wide, shit" and "lel, digital stitching" response I was going to give you.
