>>2945455I like the idea of this photo, but the composition is imperfect and the processing looks kind of strange. My depth cues are kind of messed up from the large areas of high contrast layered on top of each other (light background, very dark midground, light foreground again). My monitor isn't properly calibrated right now, but when I check on my Apple devices it still looks like the colours are a bit wonky. Like a magenta shift or something.
>>2945459I repeat my complaint about depth cues but I like this photo a lot anyway. It's got a lot of nice tones and colours to it, my only real complaint there's no clear main subject. Maybe that's not such a bad thing.
>>2945460>>2945465>>29454748/8 gr8
>>2945482This looks super comfy but I wish it was framed just a bit looser. Hut takes up too much space imo
You responded to another anon about that, but I'm not certain that more trees in the midground is such a bad thing. It might be nice and [contextual]
>>2945496Beautiful sunset and colours, but ultimately kind of boring
>>2945525GET THESE DIRTY HUMANS OUT OF MY PRISTINE WILDERNESS RRREEEEEEE
>>2945535It looks like something really cool is happening in the background. I'm not sure what the right way to approach this photo is, it certainly had a lot of potential, but there's no good middle and the foreground is lacklustre
>>2945580I would definitely stay at this hotel if given the chance and a bolt cutter
>>2945775lol why an outhouse shot? If this is documentary-like, or like a vacation photo for yourself, I can see why you took it. The depth of the snow is interesting (to me), but I don't think it's not a good photo on its own or part of a set.
>>2945778>>2945873>>2945896Pretty good, looks like marketing material for an REI catalogue
>>2945894Really cool rock, but again I think I would have framed it a bit wider
>>2945917c r u s h e d b l a c k s
Also I don't know if square frame is the best choice, and also depth cues again
