>>2950399Two things I noticed positively: rule of thirds, attention of the guy which brings interest
An overexposed background and intersections i.e. headlight vs. fence disturb.
>>2950400The composition has potential. Overall, the vase is lacking dof and the background could be restful instead of busy.
>>2950406Colors and sharpness is good, the scene looks interesting too. Get yourself into composing, framing and negative space. I am bothered by a centered horizon, a color spot in the center. The building on the left needs space at the top. It all works like separate pictures, crammed together in one.
>>2950407You could cut from bottom, left and right. Your colors are dull and you are lacking sharpness due to high iso. Dof would be enough with apertures f/5.6 and maybe even wider too.
>>2950410What's your purpose? An ugly wall, a guy not interacting with the scene or even the seagull? Too much space, to much together.
>>2950415Catch him from the front. Faces show emotion!
>>2950417Okay here! Cut from the right, thus the girl is not centered anymore. Also you'll get rid of the stairs which lead attention to the guy.
>>2950418Drop the door and get a calm background
>>2950421The car-tracks (lines in general) should lead to your subject. The atmosphere here fits best in landscape format, cut from bottom and top. With focus on the water and clouds it's also easier to let the colors pop.
>>2950424What did you think by hiding the guy and his bike?
>>2950433With more highlights the shot could still tell the viewer it's evening. It appeals dull/underexposed.
>>2950434I don't know why, but I don't like it. I guess it's too empty, too broad? I find the curve exciting, where the road runs up. Go for a portrait cut of it.
>>2950542Be more specific. I wonder what the guy is doing, the rest does not catch my interest.
>>2950605Photos of cars often bring very imposing backgrounds, yours is not. Again highlights are missing. It is dull/underexposed.
