I'm a n00b too, but seeing that nobody is commenting, I'll do it.
>>2954738I like it, but it's too tall. It might work a lot better if you make it square.
>>2954737Doesn't really catch my eye, and the river reflection is more distracting than compelling.
>>2954722I don't really like that much grain, or her lips gesture. Also, her eyes look beautiful, but they are underexposed on that photo.
>>2954676 >>2954677The second one is trash for me, but the first one might turn into something interesting with more practice.
>>2954667I like this kind of pics, but the water is too blurry for a non-blurry pic, and not blurry enough for a long exposition. Decide on one or the other. Same for the boat.
>>2954655I like it, but I feel that it needs a bit more space on the right.
>>2954629I get the idea, really, but the bokeh looks terrible, and the angle doesn't cut it for me. I like the telescope, though.
>>2954619Terrible reflections. Get a softbox.
>>2954486Try to take a less blurry one. The subject could be more interesting, but given what you got to work with, it could be ok.
>>2954460You're more into tech than into photography, it seems. Why do you need it to have 67mp? Do you plan to print it covering a building? If not, pay more attention to the pic and less to the tech. And about the pic, I like the reflection and all that, but the van and the tightness of the building and the bridge kill it for me. Is it me or there is some kind of distortion on the building on the right too?
>>2954455Very cliché, but well done.
>>2954413Really like it. Would have loved a bit more space to the left, but it's nice as-is.
>>2954399 >>2954396Nothingness, or even less because of no contrast.
